Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Audi A2 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Audi A2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 39 cm longer than the Audi A2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | 1085 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 48 litres more trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Audi A2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi A2, so Audi A2 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Audi A2 has
| |