Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Opel Astra 2016

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Opel Astra
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP160 HP
Torque: 240 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds8.9 seconds
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 59 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.1
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 120 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1330 km on highway
910 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.70 m
Width: 1.65 m1.81 m
Height: 1.45 m1.51 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 48 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1630 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 114 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 405 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`985
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 12008200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv