Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Volkswagen Golf 1999

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP68 HP
Torque: 125 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.3 seconds18.5 seconds
Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.2
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1270 km on highway
910 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.40 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 18 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1470 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 34 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 245 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.6/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv