Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 26 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |