Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP68 HP
Torque: 125 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.3 seconds17.6 seconds
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.2
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1070 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.16 m
Width: 1.65 m1.64 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 426 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv