Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 26 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 15 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |