Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP71 HP
Torque: 125 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.3 seconds16 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.86.2
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Fabia consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1080 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.37 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Fabia is 15 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 426 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv