Skoda Fabia 2003 vs Fiat Stilo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
| Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Fabia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2003 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2003 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |