Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Peugeot 206 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP more power than Peugeot 206, but torque is 7 NM less than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 19 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 1136 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 113 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |