Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP110 HP
Torque: 126 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds9.9 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway980 km on highway
660 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.37 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Fabia is 15 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 426 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6151`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
Citroen Xsara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv