Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Volkswagen Golf 2013

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2003
Volkswagen Golf
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP122 HP
Torque: 120 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds9.7 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 54 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.15.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway1130 km on highway
610 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.56 m
Width: 1.65 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 34 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres605 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1620 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 179 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 395 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6151`860
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12009600
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.7/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv