Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 30 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |