Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP175 HP
Torque: 240 NM385 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 74 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1140 km on highway
880 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.43 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Fabia is 21 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1180 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 66 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 45 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`895
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv