Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Skoda Roomster 2006

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Skoda Roomster
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP105 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds11.5 seconds
Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.1 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1190 km on highway
880 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.20 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.45 m1.61 m
Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1780 litres
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 555 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Skoda Roomster has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv