Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Peugeot 307 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 72 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 195 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Peugeot 307 2005 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 21 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 2211 litres | |
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 94 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 986 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 2`080 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |