Skoda Fabia 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
Skoda Fabia
2007 - 2008
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 69 HP110 HP
Torque: 155 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds12.1 seconds
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 41 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.75.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
860 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.52 m
Width: 1.65 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 30 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12003600
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv