Skoda Fabia 2005 vs Audi A3 2004

 
Skoda Fabia
2005 - 2007
Audi A3
2004 - 2008
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 80 HP105 HP
Torque: 195 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds11.7 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 25 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.65.1
Real fuel consumption: 4.8 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1300 km on highway
930 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.29 m
Width: 1.65 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Fabia is 7 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1120 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 56 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The Audi A3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 105 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6801`895
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12003200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv