Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Peugeot 307 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 307 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Peugeot 307. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 21 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 2211 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 94 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 986 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |