Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 45 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 28 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 94 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Megane has
| |