Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 45 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 19 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 113 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |