Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Skoda Roomster 2006

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Skoda Roomster
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP86 HP
Torque: 112 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.3 seconds13 seconds
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 21 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway980 km on highway
690 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.20 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.45 m1.61 m
Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres1780 litres
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 555 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`670
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Skoda Roomster has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv