Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 132 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 21 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 1780 litres | |
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 555 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`670 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |