Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Citroen Berlingo 2006

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Citroen Berlingo
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP75 HP
Torque: 112 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.3 seconds14.7 seconds
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.07.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
690 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.14 m
Width: 1.65 m1.72 m
Height: 1.45 m1.81 m
Skoda Fabia is 8 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 36 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres624 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litres2800 litres
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 198 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1575 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Citroen Berlingo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv