Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Citroen Berlingo 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.81 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 8 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 36 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 624 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 2800 litres | |
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 198 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1575 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |