Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1226 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 210 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |