Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Kia Ceed 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 21 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1226 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 140 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The Kia Ceed may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 74 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |