Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1226 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 41 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |