Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 50 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1226 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 41 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |