Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.099999999999998 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1460 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |