Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Renault Megane 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Megane. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1870 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1150 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 31 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 44 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`857 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Megane scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Megane has
| |