Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.21 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.61 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`777 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |