Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Seat Ibiza 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ibiza scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |