Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Fabia) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Renault Clio) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 41 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |