Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Fabia is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 443 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 37 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`711 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |