Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Fabia) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Kia Ceed) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 38 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 64 NM more than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 534 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 54 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |