Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo 2012 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 13 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 195 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`694 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Berlingo is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |