Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 17 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`591 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
| |