Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Dacia Logan 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP less power than Dacia Logan, but torque is 25 NM more than Dacia Logan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.0 | |
| Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Caddy, Audi A1 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Fabia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 25 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 573 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1518 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 93 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`591 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |