Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 115 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The Skoda Rapid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`644 | 1`699 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |