Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 31 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 25 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1642 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 2 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 247 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`644 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |