Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.80 m | |
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 33 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 675 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 3000 litres | |
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 145 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1605 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`644 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | low | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7200 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |