Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Skoda Fabia torque is 10 NM more than Renault Clio. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.7 | |
| Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 87 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
| |