Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

 
Skoda Fabia
2015 - 2018
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 230 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11.6 seconds
Skoda Fabia and Skoda Rapid have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.44.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1370 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1480 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1050 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.30 m
Width: 1.73 m1.71 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1395 litresno data
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 115 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The Skoda Rapid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6351`699
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 68007800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv