Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2015
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 23 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 20 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`633 | 1`659 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |