Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2012

 
Skoda Fabia
2015 - 2018
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 95 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds13.9 seconds
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia and Skoda Rapid have the same engine power, but Skoda Fabia torque is 17 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.9
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1190 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.48 m
Width: 1.73 m1.71 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Skoda Fabia is 23 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1395 litres1490 litres
Skoda Fabia has 20 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5341`595
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 78007200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
Skoda Rapid has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv