Skoda Fabia 2020 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Skoda Fabia torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 118 mm (4.6 inches) | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1150 litres | 1125 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`615 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`085 kg | 1`180 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 470 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |