Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Volkswagen Golf 2017

 
Skoda Fabia
2018 -
Volkswagen Golf
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.6 Diesel
Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Golf) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 110 HP115 HP
Torque: 200 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds10.2 seconds
Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Golf.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway1280 km on highway
690 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.57 m
Width: 1.73 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.52 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 31 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres605 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 75 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`800
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10 60016 800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv