Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Megane) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Megane. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Megane version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 449 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`970 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`110 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 655 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Megane has
| |