Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Rapid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`110 kg | 1`204 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 455 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |