Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Kia Ceed) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 26 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 2 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |