Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen Berlingo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, but torque is 30 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 145 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 2`060 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`110 kg | 1`374 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 686 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Citroen Berlingo. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |