Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen Berlingo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 530 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |